← All summaries

Breast ๐Ÿค Feeling better during treatment

A new kind of drug for hot flashes — and why it matters after breast cancer

Hot flashes are one of the hardest side effects of anti-estrogen breast cancer treatment, and hormone replacement isn’t an option. A new class of non-hormonal pills that calm an overactive brain circuit — the neurokinin (NK) receptor antagonists — substantially reduced hot flashes in two recent trials, including one done specifically in women on breast cancer therapy.

~9 min readTwo phase III trialsInternationalBMJ 2024 & NEJM 2025

Who is this for?

This is for people troubled by frequent, moderate-to-severe hot flashes who cannot — or prefer not to — take hormone (estrogen) therapy. Two groups matter most here:

  • People treated for hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer who take anti-estrogen (“endocrine”) therapy such as tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor. These drugs commonly cause hot flashes, and estrogen replacement is off the table because it could feed the cancer.
  • Women going through menopause who cannot take hormones (for medical reasons) or choose not to.
What are “vasomotor symptoms”? Doctors call hot flashes and night sweats vasomotor symptoms. They are sudden waves of heat, flushing, and sweating caused by the brain’s temperature control going haywire when estrogen levels fall. For women on breast cancer endocrine therapy they can be more severe than natural menopause — and they matter beyond comfort: they disrupt sleep and quality of life, and can lead people to stop their cancer medication early, which worsens outcomes.

What kind of evidence is this?

This is a review of two recent phase III trials of a new class of drug for hot flashes — the goal being to help people feel better during and after cancer treatment, rather than to treat the cancer itself.

Understanding the disease
Finding cancer earlier
Preventing recurrence
Treating the cancer
Feeling better during treatment
First steps in humans
How we make decisions

Background: why this is a real problem — and the new idea

For women with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer, years of anti-estrogen therapy dramatically lower the chance of the cancer returning. But the same drop in estrogen that starves the cancer also triggers hot flashes — often severe, and sometimes bad enough that people quietly stop taking their pills.

The usual fix for menopausal hot flashes — estrogen replacement — is unsafe here, because adding estrogen back could stimulate the cancer. The older non-hormonal options (certain antidepressants such as venlafaxine, or gabapentin and clonidine) help only modestly, come with their own side effects, and one of them, paroxetine, can actually interfere with tamoxifen. So there has long been an unmet need.

The new idea comes from understanding why hot flashes happen. Deep in the brain sits a cluster of nerve cells (“KNDy” neurons) that help run the body’s thermostat. When estrogen falls, these neurons become overactive and fire off a chemical messenger called neurokinin B, which trips a false “too hot” alarm — the hot flash. The new drugs, neurokinin (NK) receptor antagonists, simply block that messenger.

How NK-receptor blockers calm hot flashes Three panels. With enough estrogen, the brain's thermostat stays steady. When estrogen drops, temperature-control neurons overfire and trip a false heat alarm โ€” a hot flash. An NK-receptor blocker stops that signal, so the alarm settles. WITH ENOUGH ESTROGEN thermostat neurons The body’s thermostat stays steady WHEN ESTROGEN DROPS neurokinin B signal Overfiring neurons trip a false heat alarm — a hot flash WITH AN NK BLOCKER drug The drug blocks the signal — the alarm settles
Hot flashes come from the brain, not the skin. When estrogen falls — in menopause, or because of anti-estrogen breast cancer therapy — temperature-control neurons overfire and send a “neurokinin” signal that trips a false heat alarm. NK-receptor antagonists block that signal. Fezolinetant blocks one receptor (NK-3); elinzanetant blocks two (NK-1 and NK-3).

The two trials

Two large, placebo-controlled phase III trials tested drugs from this class. It is important to know that they studied different drugs in different groups of people, so their results should be read side by side, not as a head-to-head comparison:

  • Elinzanetant (OASIS-4, NEJM 2025) — blocks two receptors (NK-1 and NK-3). This trial enrolled 474 women taking endocrine therapy for hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer (or to prevent it) — so it speaks directly to the breast cancer setting. Elinzanetant or placebo, once daily.
  • Fezolinetant (DAYLIGHT, BMJ 2024) — blocks one receptor (NK-3), and is already approved for menopausal hot flashes. This trial enrolled 453 menopausal women who were unsuitable for hormone therapy for various reasons — a general group, not specifically breast cancer patients. Fezolinetant or placebo, once daily.

A note before the results

Many women with estrogen-sensitive breast cancer suffer from hot flashes. Not only does chemotherapy induce menopause, but for younger women an important treatment strategy is to induce an artificial menopause for years at a time — and one of the most common symptoms of menopause is hot flashes. More than just a nuisance, they interfere with sleep and well-being. This new class of drugs, the NK-antagonists, is game-changing for these women.

Results: what they found

Both drugs clearly reduced hot flashes compared with placebo. Because elinzanetant is the one tested directly in women on breast cancer therapy, its results are the most relevant here.

Elinzanetant vs placebo — in women on breast cancer endocrine therapy (OASIS-4)

Had their hot flashes at least halved (by 12 weeks)
74%Elinzanetant vs 36%Placebo

Nearly 3 in 4 people on elinzanetant had at least a 50% reduction in hot flashes, roughly double the placebo group.

Fewer hot flashes per day (from about 11 a day at the start)
−7.8/dayElinzanetant vs −4.2/dayPlacebo

By 12 weeks, hot flashes dropped by about 8 a day with elinzanetant versus about 4 with placebo — a clear, meaningful difference. Benefit appeared within the first week.

Sleep and quality of life

Both improved significantly more with elinzanetant than placebo. Tellingly, 92% of those who finished the year chose to continue the drug into an optional 2-year extension.

Safety — and a key reassurance for breast cancer

Side effects were mostly mild (sleepiness, fatigue, headache); serious side effects were uncommon (2.5% vs 0.6%) and there was no signal of liver harm. Importantly, elinzanetant did not change the blood levels of tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors — so it should not interfere with the breast cancer treatment itself.

The other drug: fezolinetant (DAYLIGHT)

Fezolinetant also significantly cut hot flashes versus placebo over 24 weeks, with better sleep and quality of life, and benefit again within the first week. It is already approved for menopausal hot flashes. But two caveats matter for cancer patients: this trial was in a general group of women unsuitable for hormones — not specifically breast cancer patients — so using it in that setting is currently off-label and less well studied. And fezolinetant requires periodic liver blood tests, because a small number of people develop elevated liver enzymes on it.

Why can’t people treated for breast cancer just take estrogen (HRT) for hot flashes?

Most breast cancers that cause hot-flash trouble are “hormone-receptor-positive,” meaning estrogen fuels their growth. The entire point of endocrine therapy (tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors) is to remove or block estrogen so the cancer can’t use it. Giving estrogen back as hormone replacement would work against that — and studies have linked it to a higher risk of the cancer returning. That is exactly why a genuinely effective non-hormonal option is so valuable.

How is this different from older options like venlafaxine or gabapentin?

Antidepressants (such as venlafaxine or paroxetine), gabapentin, and clonidine have been used off-label for hot flashes for years. They help some people, but the benefit is usually modest and inconsistent, and each has its own side effects. One, paroxetine, can even blunt how well tamoxifen works, so it’s avoided in that setting. The NK-receptor antagonists are different because they target the actual brain mechanism behind hot flashes, and in these trials the effect was larger. They are, however, newer and more expensive, and long-term experience is still building.

Look up these trials Both phase III trials on ClinicalTrials.gov — elinzanetant (OASIS-4, NCT05587296, NEJM 2025) and fezolinetant (DAYLIGHT, NCT05033886, BMJ 2024).
Elinzanetant (OASIS-4) → Fezolinetant (DAYLIGHT) →

The bottom line

Hot flashes from anti-estrogen breast cancer therapy are common, genuinely disruptive, and hard to treat because hormone replacement is unsafe. A new class of non-hormonal pills — the NK-receptor antagonists — targets the brain circuit that causes hot flashes. Elinzanetant, tested directly in women on breast cancer endocrine therapy, roughly halved hot flashes in about three-quarters of patients, improved sleep and quality of life, and did not interfere with the cancer drugs. Fezolinetant, an approved cousin, also works well but was studied in a general menopausal population rather than breast cancer specifically.

What this could mean for you

  • Hot flashes are worth raising. They’re not just a nuisance — untreated, they can lead people to stop cancer medication that is protecting them. Tell your team if they’re bad.
  • There is now a targeted, non-hormonal option. Elinzanetant was designed for exactly this situation and does not appear to interfere with tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors.
  • Availability may vary. These are new drugs; approval and coverage for the breast cancer setting differ by country. Fezolinetant is approved for menopause but its use in breast cancer patients is off-label and needs liver monitoring.
  • These trials measured symptoms, not cancer outcomes. They did not test whether the drugs affect cancer recurrence or survival — reassuringly, elinzanetant didn’t alter the cancer-drug levels, but long-term cancer safety is still being followed.
For information purposes only. This summary explains published research in plain language. It is not medical advice and is not a substitute for care from your own doctors. Trial results describe what happened in a study group and may not apply to your situation. Always discuss your diagnosis, treatment options, and any clinical trial with your own oncology team before making any decisions.

Questions & comments

Have a question about this research? Ask below. Questions are read and answered by the site. We can’t give personal medical advice, but we’re glad to explain the research more clearly.

Please don’t include personal health details. Comments are moderated before they appear.